Hold timer expired: difference between Received/Error

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:59:56AM +0100, Matthew Walster wrote:
> Arnold,
> 
> I could be wrong, but the most logical explanation would be:
> 
> > 2011-04-29 18:24:36 <RMT> XXXX: Received: Hold timer expired
> 
> Notification received, hold timer expired (error code 3.4, as per RFC1771).
> 
> > 2011-04-30 00:05:42 <RMT> YYYY: Error: Hold timer expired
> 
> Hold timer expired locally. Presumably a notification would be
> generated and sent to the remote peer before session tear-down.

Yes, exactly that.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20110630/b6394c84/attachment-0001.asc>