BIRD memory usage

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Justin Cattle wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> 
> After running with this latest fixup commit for a week, I see mixed results.
> 
> With the first fix you created, all the processes remained using a very
> small amount of memory, consistently.  As per my previous email, around
> 80Mg.
> With the second fix, some of the bird processes are using up to about
> 600Mg, but some are still using more like the 80Mg from the first fix.
> And, there is a mixture in between those two extremes.
> 
> So my question is  - is this normal and expected now, of is there a
> potential issue with the second fix?

Hi

We found that there was one minor leak that was overlooked in the second fix.

You can try attached patch v3.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: export_merged_fix-v3.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 6594 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20160919/e32a84b3/attachment.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20160919/e32a84b3/attachment.asc>