[PATCH 1/2] Babel: Add option to support ecmp routes

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen toke at toke.dk
Sun May 8 21:06:43 CEST 2022


(+ Juliusz)

Daniel Gröber <dxld at darkboxed.org> writes:
> ---
> The FIB walks in babel_reconfigure_iface are a bit ugly, I tried to
> loop over ifa->neigh_list instead but couldn't get it to work. I'm
> open to suggestions :)
>
>  doc/bird.sgml        |  8 +++++
>  proto/babel/babel.c  | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  proto/babel/babel.h  |  3 ++
>  proto/babel/config.Y |  3 ++
>  4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/bird.sgml b/doc/bird.sgml
> index 1580facd..5e85d8ec 100644
> --- a/doc/bird.sgml
> +++ b/doc/bird.sgml
> @@ -1879,6 +1879,7 @@ protocol babel [<name>] {
>  		check link <switch>;
>  		next hop ipv4 <address>;
>  		next hop ipv6 <address>;
> +		ecmp <switch> [limit <num>];
>  		authentication none|mac [permissive];
>  		password "<text>";
>  		password "<text>" {
> @@ -1983,6 +1984,13 @@ protocol babel [<name>] {
>        source for Babel packets will be used. In normal operation, it should not
>        be necessary to set this option.
>  
> +      <tag><label id="babel-ecmp">ecmp <m>switch</m> [limit <m>number</m>]</tag>
> +
> +      Determines whether babel will emit ECMP (equal-cost multipath)
> +      routes, allowing to load-balancing traffic across multiple paths. If
> +      enabled the maximum number of next-hops to allow can be specified,
> +      defaulting to 16.

This should probably explain the constraints: i.e., that only
equal-weight routes are added (which in practice limits it to interfaces
of type 'wired', or wireless interfaces with no packet loss, I suppose?)
and that the routes all have to be feasible (though I'm not sure if we
explain feasibility in the docs anywhere).

>        <tag><label id="babel-authentication">authentication none|mac [permissive]</tag>
>        Selects authentication method to be used. <cf/none/ means that packets
>        are not authenticated at all, <cf/mac/ means MAC authentication is
> diff --git a/proto/babel/babel.c b/proto/babel/babel.c
> index 4a7d550f..4d9c657c 100644
> --- a/proto/babel/babel.c
> +++ b/proto/babel/babel.c
> @@ -623,6 +623,34 @@ done:
>    }
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * babel_nexthop_insert - add next_hop of route to nexthop list
> + * @p: Babel protocol instance
> + * @r: Babel route
> + * @nhs: nexthop list head to append onto
> + * @nh: freshly allocated buffer to fill
> + */
> +static void
> +babel_nexthop_insert(
> +  struct babel_proto *p,
> +  struct babel_route *r,
> +  struct nexthop **nhs,
> +  struct nexthop *nh)
> +{
> +  nh->gw = r->next_hop;
> +  nh->iface = r->neigh->ifa->iface;
> +
> +  /*
> +   * If we cannot find a reachable neighbour, set the entry to be onlink. This
> +   * makes it possible to, e.g., assign /32 addresses on a mesh interface and
> +   * have routing work.
> +   */
> +  if (!neigh_find(&p->p, r->next_hop, r->neigh->ifa->iface, 0))
> +    nh->flags = RNF_ONLINK;
> +
> +  nexthop_insert(nhs, nh);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * babel_announce_rte - announce selected route to the core
>   * @p: Babel protocol instance
> @@ -635,6 +663,7 @@ done:
>  static void
>  babel_announce_rte(struct babel_proto *p, struct babel_entry *e)
>  {
> +  struct babel_config *cf = (void *) p->p.cf;
>    struct babel_route *r = e->selected;
>    struct channel *c = (e->n.addr->type == NET_IP4) ? p->ip4_channel : p->ip6_channel;
>  
> @@ -645,18 +674,24 @@ babel_announce_rte(struct babel_proto *p, struct babel_entry *e)
>        .source = RTS_BABEL,
>        .scope = SCOPE_UNIVERSE,
>        .dest = RTD_UNICAST,
> -      .from = r->neigh->addr,
> -      .nh.gw = r->next_hop,
> -      .nh.iface = r->neigh->ifa->iface,
>      };
>  
> -    /*
> -     * If we cannot find a reachable neighbour, set the entry to be onlink. This
> -     * makes it possible to, e.g., assign /32 addresses on a mesh interface and
> -     * have routing work.
> -     */
> -    if (!neigh_find(&p->p, r->next_hop, r->neigh->ifa->iface, 0))
> -      a0.nh.flags = RNF_ONLINK;
> +    struct nexthop *nhs = NULL;
> +    babel_nexthop_insert(p, r, &nhs, allocz(sizeof(struct nexthop)));
> +    int num_nexthops = 1;
> +
> +    struct babel_route *cr;
> +    WALK_LIST(cr, e->routes) {
> +      if (num_nexthops++ >= cf->ecmp)
> +	break;
> +
> +      if (cr == r || !cr->feasible || cr->metric != r->metric)
> +	continue;

You should probably switch the order of those two checks? You're
increasing the counter even if the route is subsequently discarded...

> +
> +      babel_nexthop_insert(p, cr, &nhs, allocz(sizeof(struct nexthop)));
> +    }
> +
> +    a0.nh = *nhs;
>  
>      rta *a = rta_lookup(&a0);
>      rte *rte = rte_get_temp(a);
> @@ -736,6 +771,7 @@ babel_announce_retraction(struct babel_proto *p, struct babel_entry *e)
>  static void
>  babel_select_route(struct babel_proto *p, struct babel_entry *e, struct babel_route *mod)
>  {
> +  struct babel_config *cf = (void *) p->p.cf;
>    struct babel_route *r, *best = e->selected;
>  
>    /* Shortcut if only non-best was modified */
> @@ -744,8 +780,10 @@ babel_select_route(struct babel_proto *p, struct babel_entry *e, struct babel_ro
>      /* Either select modified route, or keep old best route */
>      if ((mod->metric < (best ? best->metric : BABEL_INFINITY)) && mod->feasible)
>        best = mod;
> -    else
> +    else if (cf->ecmp==1)

This looks like you're returning if ECMP is enabled; I think finding a
better name for that config variable would be good; maybe just
"max_nexthops"?

>        return;
> +    /* With ecmp one of the non-selected but equal metric routes might have
> +     * changed so contine on with the announcement in that case. */
>    }
>    else
>    {
> @@ -1879,6 +1917,16 @@ babel_reconfigure_iface(struct babel_proto *p, struct babel_iface *ifa, struct b
>    if (ifa->up)
>      babel_iface_kick_timer(ifa);
>  
> +  /* Update all routes to refresh ecmp settings. */
> +  FIB_WALK(&p->ip6_rtable, struct babel_entry, e) {
> +    babel_select_route(p, e, NULL);
> +  }
> +  FIB_WALK_END;
> +  FIB_WALK(&p->ip4_rtable, struct babel_entry, e) {
> +    babel_select_route(p, e, NULL);
> +  }
> +  FIB_WALK_END;
> +

I don't think this is the right thing to do; you should probably just
refuse the reconfiguration if ECMP settings changed (see the 0-return at
the top when TOS changes)?

>    return 1;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/proto/babel/babel.h b/proto/babel/babel.h
> index 84feb085..3868dcb2 100644
> --- a/proto/babel/babel.h
> +++ b/proto/babel/babel.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@
>  #define BABEL_OVERHEAD		(IP6_HEADER_LENGTH+UDP_HEADER_LENGTH)
>  #define BABEL_MIN_MTU		(512 + BABEL_OVERHEAD)
>  
> +#define BABEL_DEFAULT_ECMP_LIMIT	16
> +
>  #define BABEL_AUTH_NONE			0
>  #define BABEL_AUTH_MAC			1
>  
> @@ -120,6 +122,7 @@ struct babel_config {
>    list iface_list;			/* List of iface configs (struct babel_iface_config) */
>    uint hold_time;			/* Time to hold stale entries and unreachable routes */
>    u8 randomize_router_id;
> +  u8 ecmp;                              /* Maximum number of nexthops to install */

See above re: the naming of this; 'max_nexthops'?

>    struct channel_config *ip4_channel;
>    struct channel_config *ip6_channel;
> diff --git a/proto/babel/config.Y b/proto/babel/config.Y
> index 05210fa4..8f18c790 100644
> --- a/proto/babel/config.Y
> +++ b/proto/babel/config.Y
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ babel_proto_start: proto_start BABEL
>    this_proto = proto_config_new(&proto_babel, $1);
>    init_list(&BABEL_CFG->iface_list);
>    BABEL_CFG->hold_time = 1 S_;
> +  BABEL_CFG->ecmp = 1;
>  };
>  
>  babel_proto_item:
> @@ -43,6 +44,8 @@ babel_proto_item:
>   | proto_channel
>   | INTERFACE babel_iface
>   | RANDOMIZE ROUTER ID bool { BABEL_CFG->randomize_router_id = $4; }
> + | ECMP bool { BABEL_CFG->ecmp = $2 ? BABEL_DEFAULT_ECMP_LIMIT : 1; }
> + | ECMP bool LIMIT expr { BABEL_CFG->ecmp = $2 ? $4 : 1; }
>   ;
>  
>  babel_proto_opts:
> -- 
> 2.30.2



More information about the Bird-users mailing list