<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
I was performing a home lab and decided to test a new scenario
including iBGP between a router and RS.<br>
That's a brief scheme of the lab:<br>
<br>
###<br>
5.5.5.1 5.5.5.2 6.6.6.100/24
6.6.6.6/24
6.6.6.101/24<br>
Router3 (as3)---eBGP---> Router2 (as2)---iBGP/not a
rs_client---> RS (as2)---eBGP / rs_client--- > Router1 (as1)<br>
3.3.3.0/24 2.2.2.0/24
1.1.1.0/24<br>
###<br>
<br>
Since, as route 3.3.3.0/24 is seen in RS directly attached ( first
asn is as3) with next-hop 6.6.6.100 (I've set the next-hop manually
into the RS's config in bgp_in) I expect that Router1 should see it
in the same way - with hext-hop 6.6.6.100.<br>
But the route is shown with next-hop 6.6.6.6 instead. The first asn
is as3 as expected.<br>
<br>
Do you have any idea why the next-hop is not propagated from RS to
R1 as present in the master table but changed to the local IP
address ?<br>
I think its related with the "not a rs_client" relation between
Router2 and RS. Any idea how this behavior may be changed ?<br>
<br>
Thank you in advance!
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<style>
<!--
.txt1{
font-family:Verdana;
color:#103e81;
font-size:12px;
}
.txt2{
font-family:Verdana;
color:#00ace5;
font-size:12px;
}
a:link{
color:00ace5;
text-decoration:none;
}
a:visited{
color:00ace5;
text-decoration:none;
}
-->
</style>
<div class="txt1">
---<br>
<strong>Dean Belev</strong></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>