Hi all,
Yesterday I was partying that I was able to inject static MAC-IP routes into EVPN on Bird 3.3.0 with the correct VNI using the mpls_label attribute.
The joy was disturbed today, when I tried to set a different bgp_next_hop than the local host. As soon as I set the bgp_next_hop this forces the VNI/mpls_label to be encoded as 0. While the local export table shows the configured mpls_label, the remote side receives VNI=0.
I found a workaround in explicitly setting next hop address in the BGP protocol's evpn channel.
Yet my expectation would be that explicitly setting bgp_next_hop does not have any influence on treating the VNI/mpls_label.
Abbreviated config:
evpn table t_evpn;
protocol static {
evpn { table t_evpn; };
route evpn mac
172.25.110.202:100 0 c0:12:34:56:78:9a 2001:db8::1 drop;
}
filter export_evpn {
if ( net.evpn_type = NET_EVPN_MAC ) then {
bgp_ext_community.add((generic, 0x30c0000, 0x8));
bgp_ext_community.add((rt, 10, my_vlan));
bgp_ext_community.add((generic, 0x6000000, 0x0));
mpls_label = 100100;
bgp_next_hop = 10.49.0.0;
}
accept;
}
protocol bgp core01 {
local as my_asn;
evpn {
table t_evpn;
import none;
export filter export_evpn;
next hop address 10.49.0.0;
};
neighbor 172.25.110.201 as my_asn;
}
With this configuration the VNI in outbound UPDATE is set to 0. Without bgp_next_hop in the filter the BGP UPDATE contains VNI 100100.
Best wishes,
André
--
+49 30 2332195 42
BCIX Management GmbH
Albrechtstr. 110
12103 Berlin
Germany
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Jens Lietzmann, André Grüneberg
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 143581 B