I am in the process of implementing your suggestion of assigning IPs from a pool specific to each router. Initial results suggest that it works perfectly! Thank you for the feedback!

Example:

router1:

stubnet 172.16.16.0/29

router2 tun: 172.16.16.0

router3 tun: 172.16.16.1

router2:

stubnet 172.16.16.8/29

router1 tun: 172.16.16.8

router3 tun: 172.16.16.9

router3:

stubnet 172.16.16.16/29

router1 tun: 172.16.16.16

router2 tun: 172.16.16.17

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@crfreenet.org> wrote:

I would have another suggestion - do not propagate these as independent /32s.
Either consider them as a kind of 'link-local' IP, or use IPs for them from
some wider pool (either some local ethernet stub network or some designated
pool of ptp endpoint IPs for given router), which is propagated as a whole.