Is Bird still being worked on? I'm playing around a bit with it, and it seems to forget the nexthop part of the routes it gets: bird> show route 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 on eth1 [kernel1 12:16] (10) 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20) 10.4.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.5.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 [direct1 Nov02] (240) dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/10) 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/11) 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo [direct1 Nov02] (240) 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20) # ip route 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 proto bird 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 proto bird 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 dev eth1 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.7.26 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.7.26 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link Both Zebra and Cisco gets it right. Any ideas? -- - Terje malmedal@usit.uio.no
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Terje Malmedal wrote:
Is Bird still being worked on?
Yes, a little bit. Which version do you use?
I'm playing around a bit with it, and it seems to forget the nexthop part of the routes it gets:
bird> show route 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 on eth1 [kernel1 12:16] (10) 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20) 10.4.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.5.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 [direct1 Nov02] (240) dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/10) 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/11) 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo [direct1 Nov02] (240) 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20)
# ip route 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 proto bird 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 proto bird 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 dev eth1 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.7.26 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.7.26 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
Both Zebra and Cisco gets it right.
Could you send me 'ip r l' from Zebra?
Any ideas?
Feela
[Ondrej Feela Filip]
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Terje Malmedal wrote:
Is Bird still being worked on?
Yes, a little bit. Which version do you use?
Bird version 1.0.5, Kernel is 2.4.18-10smp from RedHat.
I'm playing around a bit with it, and it seems to forget the nexthop part of the routes it gets:
bird> show route 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 on eth1 [kernel1 12:16] (10) 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20) 10.4.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.5.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 [direct1 Nov02] (240) dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/10) 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/11) 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo [direct1 Nov02] (240) 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20)
# ip route 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 proto bird 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 proto bird 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 dev eth1 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.7.26 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.7.26 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
Both Zebra and Cisco gets it right.
Could you send me 'ip r l' from Zebra?
Bird does not accept the command, Linux does though: # ip r l 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 proto bird 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 proto bird 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 dev eth1 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.7.26 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.7.26 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link 62.70.74.224/28 and 62.70.74.192/27 are announced by a Cisco while 10.3.8.0/24 and 10.9.8.0/24 are coming from Zebra. -- - Terje malmedal@usit.uio.no
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Terje Malmedal wrote:
[Ondrej Feela Filip]
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Terje Malmedal wrote:
Is Bird still being worked on?
Yes, a little bit. Which version do you use?
Bird version 1.0.5, Kernel is 2.4.18-10smp from RedHat.
OKay. Could you send me exact number of RPM package you use?
I'm playing around a bit with it, and it seems to forget the nexthop part of the routes it gets:
bird> show route 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 on eth1 [kernel1 12:16] (10) 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20) 10.4.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.5.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 [direct1 Nov02] (240) dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/10) 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/11) 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo [direct1 Nov02] (240) 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20)
# ip route 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 proto bird 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 proto bird 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 dev eth1 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.7.26 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.7.26 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
Both Zebra and Cisco gets it right.
Could you send me 'ip r l' from Zebra?
Bird does not accept the command, Linux does though:
OK, I just wanted you to send me 'ip r l' while Zebra is running. Could you test Zebra on that machine? Or could you send me relevant oarts of configs from Zebra & Cisco?
# ip r l 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 proto bird 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 proto bird 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 dev eth1 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.7.26 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.7.26 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
62.70.74.224/28 and 62.70.74.192/27 are announced by a Cisco while 10.3.8.0/24 and 10.9.8.0/24 are coming from Zebra.
Feela
[Ondrej Fila Filip]
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Terje Malmedal wrote:
[Ondrej Feela Filip]
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Terje Malmedal wrote:
Is Bird still being worked on?
Yes, a little bit. Which version do you use?
Bird version 1.0.5, Kernel is 2.4.18-10smp from RedHat.
OKay. Could you send me exact number of RPM package you use?
bird is built from source, The kernel is kernel-smp-2.4.18-10.i686.rpm
I'm playing around a bit with it, and it seems to forget the nexthop part of the routes it gets:
bird> show route 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 on eth1 [kernel1 12:16] (10) 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 [direct1 Nov02] (240) 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20) 10.4.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.5.8.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 on eth0 [gaustad 12:16] E2 (150/20/20) 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 [direct1 Nov02] (240) dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/10) 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/11) 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo [direct1 Nov02] (240) 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 [gaustad 12:16] I (150/20)
# ip route 62.70.74.224/28 dev eth0 proto bird 62.70.74.192/27 dev eth0 proto bird 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.2.7.1 dev eth1 10.2.7.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.7.26 10.3.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird 10.1.7.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.7.26 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
Both Zebra and Cisco gets it right.
Could you send me 'ip r l' from Zebra?
Bird does not accept the command, Linux does though:
OK, I just wanted you to send me 'ip r l' while Zebra is running.
Ah, sorry. This is on the zebra box: [root@cornavin zebra-0.93b]# ip route 62.70.74.224/28 via 10.9.8.1 dev eth0 proto zebra metric 20 62.70.74.192/27 via 10.9.8.1 dev eth0 proto zebra metric 11 10.2.6.0/24 via 10.9.8.26 dev eth0 proto zebra metric 110 10.2.7.0/24 via 10.9.8.26 dev eth0 proto zebra metric 110 10.3.8.0/24 dev dummy0 proto kernel scope link src 10.3.8.21 10.5.8.0/24 via 10.3.8.1 dev dummy0 10.9.8.0/24 dev eth0 scope link 10.1.7.0/24 via 10.9.8.26 dev eth0 proto zebra metric 110 10.4.8.0/24 via 10.3.8.1 dev dummy0 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link default via 10.9.8.1 dev eth0 Bird is 10.9.8.26 Zebra is 10.9.8.21 and Cisco is 1.9.8.1
Could you test Zebra on that machine?
I've tried both Zebra and Bird on Both machines, the results are identical both from Zebra and Bird.
Or could you send me relevant oarts of configs from Zebra & Cisco?
Sure, this is Zebra: cornavin# show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration: ! hostname Router password zebra enable password zebra hostname ospfd enable password zebra log stdout ! interface lo ! interface teql0 ! interface tunl0 ! interface gre0 ! interface eth0 ! interface dummy0 ! router ospf ospf router-id 10.9.8.21 redistribute kernel redistribute connected redistribute static network 10.3.8.0/24 area 0 network 10.4.8.0/24 area 0 network 10.5.8.0/24 area 0 network 10.9.8.0/24 area 0 distribute-list yohoo out kernel ! access-list yohoo permit any ! cornavin# show ip route Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, O - OSPF, B - BGP, > - selected route, * - FIB route K>* 0.0.0.0/0 via 10.9.8.1, eth0 O>* 10.1.7.0/24 [110/110] via 10.9.8.26, eth0, 00:03:51 O>* 10.2.6.0/24 [110/110] via 10.9.8.26, eth0, 00:03:51 O>* 10.2.7.0/24 [110/110] via 10.9.8.26, eth0, 00:03:51 O 10.3.8.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, dummy0, 00:04:15 C>* 10.3.8.0/24 is directly connected, dummy0 K>* 10.4.8.0/24 via 10.3.8.1, dummy0 K>* 10.5.8.0/24 via 10.3.8.1, dummy0 O 10.9.8.0/24 [110/10] is directly connected, eth0, 00:03:52 K * 10.9.8.0/24 is directly connected, eth0 C>* 10.9.8.0/24 is directly connected, eth0 O>* 62.70.74.192/27 [110/11] via 10.9.8.1, eth0, 00:03:52 O>* 62.70.74.224/28 [110/20] via 10.9.8.1, eth0, 00:03:52 K * 127.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, lo C>* 127.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, lo And on the Cisco i just did: router ospf 666 log-adjacency-changes redistribute connected subnets redistribute static subnets passive-interface default no passive-interface FastEthernet0/1 network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0 fp-gw1#show ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is 62.70.74.225 to network 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 7 subnets O 10.3.8.0 [110/11] via 10.9.8.21, 00:08:11, FastEthernet0/1 O E2 10.4.8.0 [110/20] via 10.9.8.21, 00:08:11, FastEthernet0/1 O E2 10.5.8.0 [110/20] via 10.9.8.21, 00:08:11, FastEthernet0/1 C 10.9.8.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1 O E1 10.1.7.0 [110/101] via 10.9.8.26, 00:08:11, FastEthernet0/1 O E1 10.2.6.0 [110/101] via 10.9.8.26, 00:08:11, FastEthernet0/1 O E1 10.2.7.0 [110/101] via 10.9.8.26, 00:08:11, FastEthernet0/1 62.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 62.70.74.224/28 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0 C 62.70.74.192/27 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 62.70.74.225 Oh and the Bird config is: protocol device { # #scan time 10; } protocol direct { } protocol kernel { import all; learn; export filter { print net; if scope = SCOPE_HOST then { #if net ~ 10.9.8.0/24 then { reject; } else { accept; } }; } protocol ospf gaustad { #rfc1583compat yes; debug all; import all; export filter { ospf_metric1 = 100; accept; }; area 0 { tick 8; interface "eth0" { #hello 30; retransmit 6; cost 10; #transit delay 5; #dead count 5; wait 50; type broadcast; authentication none; password "pass"; }; }; } The export filter on protocol kernel is an attempt to stop Bird from accepting routes to directly conncted subnets. It doesn't seem to be working. -- - Terje malmedal@usit.uio.no
participants (3)
-
Ondrej Feela Filip -
Ondrej Fila Filip
-
Terje Malmedal