Hi! New version is ready! It includes mainly minor bugfixes and minor improvements all made by Santiago. We are working on packaging and other stuff. Changes: Version 1.3.2 o Allows run with restricted privileges. o Community list filter operation. o Fixes several problems in filter syntax: - Fixes several conflicts in the grammar. - Fixes a bug in (a..b, c) pair patterns. - Makes pair patterns orthogonal. - Allows term expressions in pair patterns without additional (). - Allows several comma separated values in switch cases. o Many bugfixes. Ondrej
On Sunday 10 of July 2011, Ondrej Filip wrote:
Hi! New version is ready! It includes mainly minor bugfixes and minor improvements all made by Santiago. We are working on packaging and other stuff.
Changes: Version 1.3.2
Tag is missing in git repo. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/
On 11.7.2011 10:19, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Sunday 10 of July 2011, Ondrej Filip wrote:
Hi! New version is ready! It includes mainly minor bugfixes and minor improvements all made by Santiago. We are working on packaging and other stuff.
Changes: Version 1.3.2
Tag is missing in git repo.
Fixed.
Hi! A new version is ready! Changes: Version 1.3.3 o OSPF NSSA o BGP extended communities o BGP TTL security o Configuration option "include" added (based on patch by Alexander V. Chernikov) o Some minor bugfixes. Ondrej
Hi! A new version is ready! Changes: Version 1.3.4 o Static recursive routes. o Several bugfixes. Ondrej
Hi On 10/10/11 10:13 , Ondrej Filip wrote:
Hi! A new version is ready!
That is good news!
Changes: Version 1.3.4 o Static recursive routes. o Several bugfixes.
Including the include bug it seems... I'm really thankful and don't want to push anything or anybody, but... How do you handle the building of packages? When will we see a debian/lenny package for 1.3.4?
Ondrej
/Tias
--On 10 October 2011 16:03:34 +0200 Mathias Wolkert <tias@netnod.se> wrote:
I'm really thankful and don't want to push anything or anybody, but... How do you handle the building of packages? When will we see a debian/lenny package for 1.3.4?
Actually this is a question I was wondering about too. I use the Ubuntu package which I think is a straight copy of the source tree with a 'debian' directory in it. Would it be possible to put the debian directory in the source tree too? That would let us build our own packages more easily. I am pretty sure one of the core developers is the debian maintainer (apologies if I have got this wrong). -- Alex Bligh
On 10.10.2011 16:10, Alex Bligh wrote:
--On 10 October 2011 16:03:34 +0200 Mathias Wolkert <tias@netnod.se> wrote:
I'm really thankful and don't want to push anything or anybody, but... How do you handle the building of packages? When will we see a debian/lenny package for 1.3.4?
Actually this is a question I was wondering about too. I use the Ubuntu package which I think is a straight copy of the source tree with a 'debian' directory in it. Would it be possible to put the debian directory in the source tree too? That would let us build our own packages more easily. I am pretty sure one of the core developers is the debian maintainer (apologies if I have got this wrong).
Hi Alex, the Debian maintainer is not the part of the core team (however he works for CZ.NIC, I know we are all named Ondrej...) and he doesn't really think it's a good idea to mix and match upstream development and Debian packaging. But the good thing is that the Debian packaging is kept in the git as well and can be accessed via browser at: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/ondrej/bird.git (there are git specific URLs for git clone access) The packages are created using git-buildpackage tool and the repository is kept up-to-date with still fresh and hot upstream sources. Ondrej
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:37 +0200, Ondrej Filip wrote:
But the good thing is that the Debian packaging is kept in the git as well and can be accessed via browser at:
You're also welcome to use the mirror I have on Launchpad. https://code.launchpad.net/bird There are bazaar code branches on there handling the packaging and the main code along with a daily recipe based autobuild of any changes into the Brightbox experimental PPA ppa:brightbox/experimental for all the recent versions of Ubuntu. Rgs Neil
On 10.10.2011 16:03, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Hi
On 10/10/11 10:13 , Ondrej Filip wrote:
Hi! A new version is ready!
That is good news!
Changes: Version 1.3.4 o Static recursive routes. o Several bugfixes.
Including the include bug it seems...
I'm really thankful and don't want to push anything or anybody, but... How do you handle the building of packages? When will we see a debian/lenny package for 1.3.4?
I believe it is done. :-) Ondrej
Ondrej
/Tias
On 10/10/11 16:12 , Ondrej Filip wrote:
On 10.10.2011 16:03, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Hi
On 10/10/11 10:13 , Ondrej Filip wrote:
Hi! A new version is ready!
That is good news!
Changes: Version 1.3.4 o Static recursive routes. o Several bugfixes.
Including the include bug it seems...
I'm really thankful and don't want to push anything or anybody, but... How do you handle the building of packages? When will we see a debian/lenny package for 1.3.4?
I believe it is done. :-)
It was, and the include bug is fixed. Big thanks to all. /Tias
Ondrej
Ondrej
/Tias
Hi all As I'm moving forward on my bird implementation, the bugs/change requests get smaller and smaller. Now I'm down to picky little details such as default config path in Debian. If I'm not mistaken, it's good Debian behavior to have daemon specific directory e.g. "/etc/bird/". Do you agree? /Tias
Le 21/10/2011 11:18, Mathias Wolkert a écrit :
Hi all
As I'm moving forward on my bird implementation, the bugs/change requests get smaller and smaller.
Now I'm down to picky little details such as default config path in Debian. If I'm not mistaken, it's good Debian behavior to have daemon specific directory e.g. "/etc/bird/".
Do you agree?
+1 Stéphane.
--On 21 October 2011 11:18:03 +0200 Mathias Wolkert <tias@netnod.se> wrote:
Now I'm down to picky little details such as default config path in Debian. If I'm not mistaken, it's good Debian behavior to have daemon specific directory e.g. "/etc/bird/".
In debian, bird and bird6 are separate packages, so by that logic we'd have /etc/bird/ and /etc/bird6/ I am not sure of the exact DSFG specs, but I would be surprised if they mandate a directory when there is only one config file per package (which there is in this case). A brief examination of my /etc/ suggests that there are rather a lot of packages who have single config file per package in /etc/, and my /etc/ would be no less busy if there were directories there rather than files. As moving it has the ability to break things, unless the DSFG has this as a MUST in capital letters and flashing text, I'd leave it the way it is. What you DO need to do is include /etc/defaults/bird{,6} into your init.d file, but I think this was fixed in 1.3.3. -- Alex Bligh
On Oct 21, Mathias Wolkert <tias@netnod.se> wrote:
Now I'm down to picky little details such as default config path in Debian. If I'm not mistaken, it's good Debian behavior to have daemon specific directory e.g. "/etc/bird/". You are mistaken.
-- ciao, Marco
Thanks for all responses. I'm fine with leaving it as it is. As long as we know it's going to stay that way, I have no issues with modding it for my setup. I will have a few includes and files so it will benefit us to have a subdir. /Tias On 10/21/11 11:18 , Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Hi all
As I'm moving forward on my bird implementation, the bugs/change requests get smaller and smaller.
Now I'm down to picky little details such as default config path in Debian. If I'm not mistaken, it's good Debian behavior to have daemon specific directory e.g. "/etc/bird/".
Do you agree?
/Tias
Been waiting for the peer group implementation, No new release till date is of interest to me until that is done Warm Regards Anibe -----Original Message----- From: owner-bird-users@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz [mailto:owner-bird-users@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz] On Behalf Of Mathias Wolkert Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 3:04 PM To: Ondrej Filip; bird-users@network.cz Subject: Re: New release 1.3.4! Hi On 10/10/11 10:13 , Ondrej Filip wrote:
Hi! A new version is ready!
That is good news!
Changes: Version 1.3.4 o Static recursive routes. o Several bugfixes.
Including the include bug it seems... I'm really thankful and don't want to push anything or anybody, but... How do you handle the building of packages? When will we see a debian/lenny package for 1.3.4?
Ondrej
/Tias
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0200, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
Hi
On 10/10/11 10:13 , Ondrej Filip wrote:
Hi! A new version is ready!
That is good news!
Changes: Version 1.3.4 o Static recursive routes. o Several bugfixes.
Including the include bug it seems...
Yes, this is fixed, i hope.
I'm really thankful and don't want to push anything or anybody, but... How do you handle the building of packages? When will we see a debian/lenny package for 1.3.4?
Debian packages (backports) for the current BIRD are here: http://bird.network.cz/?download&tdir=debian/dists/ -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
participants (9)
-
Alex Bligh -
Anibe Onuche -
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz -
Mathias Wolkert -
md＠Linux.IT -
Neil Wilson -
Ondrej Filip -
Ondrej Zajicek -
Stéphane Bunel