Is this a mistake in the User's Guide?
Hi, I found here: 5.2 Data types ... int|ip|prefix|pair|enum set ... Prefix ip1/len1 matches prefix pattern ip2/len2{l, h} iff the first min(len1, len2) bits of ip1> and ip2 are identical and len1 ip1 len2. A valid prefix pattern has to satisfy low high, but pxlen is not constrained by low or high. ... I don't quite understand the first sentence. And "A valid prefix pattern has to satisfy low high", is a "<" missed between "low" and "high"? All the above is discovered using my computer when viewing User's Guide online, and I don't know if there's a possibility of mis-displaying. So I figure I'd better just send this E-mail in order to inform the developers. Thanks.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 01:15:27PM +0800, ChuYinsu wrote:
Prefix ip1/len1 matches prefix pattern ip2/len2{l, h} iff the first min(len1, len2) bits of ip1> and ip2 are identical and len1 ip1 len2. A valid prefix pattern has to satisfy low high, but pxlen is not constrained by low or high. ...
I don't quite understand the first sentence. And "A valid prefix pattern has to satisfy low high", is a "<" missed between "low" and "high"?
Yes it is a bug. Some characters are not generated from the documentation source . Thank you for reporting it. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
participants (2)
-
ChuYinsu -
Ondrej Zajicek