Hi all, I was performing a home lab and decided to test a new scenario including iBGP between a router and RS. That's a brief scheme of the lab: ### 5.5.5.1 5.5.5.2 6.6.6.100/24 6.6.6.6/24 6.6.6.101/24 Router3 (as3)---eBGP---> Router2 (as2)---iBGP/not a rs_client---> RS (as2)---eBGP / rs_client--- > Router1 (as1) 3.3.3.0/24 2.2.2.0/24 1.1.1.0/24 ### Since, as route 3.3.3.0/24 is seen in RS directly attached ( first asn is as3) with next-hop 6.6.6.100 (I've set the next-hop manually into the RS's config in bgp_in) I expect that Router1 should see it in the same way - with hext-hop 6.6.6.100. But the route is shown with next-hop 6.6.6.6 instead. The first asn is as3 as expected. Do you have any idea why the next-hop is not propagated from RS to R1 as present in the master table but changed to the local IP address ? I think its related with the "not a rs_client" relation between Router2 and RS. Any idea how this behavior may be changed ? Thank you in advance! -- --- *Dean Belev*