11 May
2016
11 May
'16
1:53 p.m.
Using random router-id seems like a good idea. Perhaps even an TLV that describes 'nominal' configured router-id, so regular router-id could be random, but routes could still contain configured router-id for admin purposes. Unfortunately, Babel does not have support for something like Opaque-LSA.
Right on all counts.
Could not help with this issue just to allow increasing seqnum by more than 1 in reaction to recevied seqno request (3.8.1.2), to value rcv_seqno+1 ?
I'm not sure it doesn't break loop avoidance, I'd need to think it over. -- Juliusz