On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:49:20PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Although adding an iface scope to link-local addresses helps a bit, link-local addresses are still confusing when there are many neighbors on one iface. Yes, definitely.
I am thinking about replacing IPs with router IDs as a primary neighbor description in most OSPF log messages. Any comments/opinions to such change? Router id is much better identifier, yes. However it is worth adding interface name as well (at least if given OSPF instance has several different interfaces).
Yes, something like 'neighbor X.X.X.X on ethX'.
Just for history purposes, what others currently do:
Thanks for the review. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."