Hi wireguard, birds, and babelers, tl;dr I want to add a new Linux route attribute (think "via $wgpeer") to supplement wireguard's internal AllowedIPs logic for both routing and source address filtering. I've been pondering how to better integrate wireguard into dynamic routing daemons, particularly BIRD and babeld. Essentially we want to be able to dynamically add/remove AllowedIPs depending on current reachability and/or link quality stats. Looking at the wg netlink API I see two major efficiency/scalability problems: 1) there is no way to be notified of changes in AllowedIPs made by other processes meaning we have to do periodic scans and 2) a peer's AllowedIPs set can only be replaced wholesale, not modified incrementally. This is problematic as "someone" might, in the worst case, want to install an entire internet routing table's worth of AllowedIPs and the set will likely change frequently. FYI: The IPv4 table has ~1M entries at present, yikes. Assuming external AllowedIPs changes are infrequent occationally dumping them all to keep a consistent view of the state shouldn't be too much of an issue as long as the netlink interface is performant enoug, so I'm going to concentrate on the add/remove API for now. Instead of doing the obvious thing and adding a more efficient incremental AllowedIPs netlink interface I figure why not just add a route attribute to select a target wg peer on a device. That way we could not only save memory (no separate AllowedIPs trie) but also simplify routing daemon implementation considerably. This would mirror how on ethernet you can have `dev eth0 via $router_ip`. I'm still reviewing the net/ code to find the best way to do this, but I'm thinking either a new RTA_WGPEER, like: `default dev wg0 via-wgpeer $peer_pubkey` or perhaps re-using RTA_VIA and keying off a statically configured AllowedIP addresses. To start I'd make this an opt-in replacement for our usual AllowedIPs logic, making sure to only activate it if any via* RTAs are active on a particular device, but if it proves to work well I don't see why we couldn't adapt the netlink code to maintain AllowedIPs using this RTA (but invisible to userspace) to re-use the same code and get rid of allowedips.c altogether. That's assuming this ends up being less code overall or perhaps more performant. Happy to hear your thoughts, --Daniel