Hello, world!\n
I think that we should expand static protocol to allow adding or deleting routes interactively. There are some problematic behavioral details in it; e.g., how we should handle interactive removal of a route from configuration. Should we have two independent sets of routes, one added/removed by reconfiguration, one interactively? Or should we allow to remove interactively one from configuration? If so, should it respawn during reconfiguration?
Maybe define a separate protocol which exports routes added/removed online? Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> http://mj.ucw.cz/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth Q: How many mathematicians does it take to screw in a lightbulb? A: 0.999999...