Děkuji moc Ondrej! That was needed, because I had altered it initially to this after having checked the ripe's slides https://ripe78.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/68-inex-ripe-reykja... So the t_roa holds what exactly? not the variable of the route objects? Thanks again , Hezký den! Irene On 9/25/19 4:14 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:36:20AM +0100, Barry O'Donovan wrote:
Hi Irene,
looks like you're trying to put together a route server config?
First thing that jumps out at me is you have "roa check" but it should be "roa_check".
We have full working sample configs that are used in our continuous integration tests for IXP Manager - here's a v4 version which includes RPKI:
https://github.com/inex/IXP-Manager/blob/master/data/travis-ci/known-good/ci... Hi
One note - for roa_check(), you should not use bgp_path.last_nonaggregated, you should use bgp_path.last, or better just use implicit form:
roa_check(t_roa)
If there is AS_SET on end position, then result should be invalid if there are related ROAs, or unknown otherwise, (see RFC 6907), it should not be check based on neighboring (nonaggregated) ASN.
-- Irene Lalioti Network Engineer Fondation RESTENA 2, avenue de l'Université L-4365 Esch/Alzette Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473