Re: vrf configuration with same addresses

5 Nov 2018


      Thanks a lot

--
Semion Lisyansky


On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:37 PM Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@crfreenet.org>
wrote:
...
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:28:44PM +0200, Semion Lisyansky wrote:
...
protocol bgp bgp_vrf01_n2 {
        vrf "vrf01";
        local as 65034;
        bfd yes;
        graceful restart;
        neighbor 192.34.1.4 as 65001;
        ipv4 {
                table table_vrf01;
                import all;
#                export all;
                export where source = RTS_BGP;
        };
}
protocol bgp bgp_vrf01_ixia1 {
        local as 65034;
#        bfd yes;
        neighbor 190.34.32.101 as 65134;
        graceful restart;
        ipv4 {
                table table_vrf01;
                import all;
                export all;
        };
}
The protocol bgp_vrf01_ixia1 is not associated with VRF (does not use
'vrf' option, unlike bgp_vrf01_n2 above), so its routes are not
associated with vrf1 and lookup is done through all interfaces.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."