30 Sep
2010
30 Sep
'10
5:16 p.m.
Ondrej Zajicek píše v St 29. 09. 2010 v 22:41 +0200:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:16:40PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Or should I really start bird6 as a second routing daemon to handle the IPv6 prefixes?
Yes.
This is silly since this means duplication of the configuration file and all the peer detection and route switching is not synchronized.
It seems silly for the first moment, but it has several advantages. IPv4 and IPv6 usually needs slightly different configs, different filters (esp. addresses in filters) and having separate IPv4 sessions and IPv6 sessions means that you forward IPv4/6 routes only if IPv4/6 is really working on the routers.
And what about BGP+ announcing IPv6 prefixes over IPv4 connection?