On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Martin Kraus wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 02:50:32PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
Hmm, interesting. Could you describe what change was done in config file, what is a topology of an affected part of the network and which router IDs were used by which routers, especially which router uses router ID 212.71.177.41?
I had to create a diagram which is (hopefully) attached to this mail as an svg. I don't think I could describe it clearly in plaintext.
There are five routers with respective IDs written inside the boxes. All are in ospf area 0.0.0.0. There is rest of the network behind routers with IDs 212.71.177.44 and 212.71.152.222 which id didn't put into the diagram. There are some additional complexities, such as a separate ospf instance from routers with IDs 212.71.177.41 and 212.71.177.42 but that wasn't affected so I didn't include that either. ...
Thank you for the thorough answer. Just one more question: from which router were the log messages you sent earlier:
31-10-2009 19:40:08 <ERR> Router's parent has no next hop. (EN=212.71.177.59, PAR=212.71.177.41) 31-10-2009 19:40:08 <ERR> Router's parent has no next hop. (EN=212.71.177.42, PAR=212.71.177.41)
-- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."