17 Feb
2020
17 Feb
'20
3:37 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 01:22:22PM +0100, Robert Sander wrote:
Hi,
On 17.02.20 09:03, Kees Meijs wrote:
The path I'm trying to avoid has the lowest OSPF cost but in the physical world the most... :-)
I always thought the OSPF cost represents the "physical" cost of a link.
Hi There is no such think as 'physical' cost of a link. Cost is always an administrative property. There are several physical properties of a link (like latency, throughput, technology) and it is a question of policy how to convert them to OSPF cost. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."