On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 04:28:17PM +0200, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
For now only OSPF authentication drops...
Hi Please check commit 60dda81b825725716c0f5ba65256e9a4c3f45948 (not part of master branch): https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/commit/60dda81b825725716c0f5ba65256e9a4... That has comprehensive set of interface statistics. I would like to include it to master, but did not yet decided about presentation of statistics (there is just crude ospf_iface_stats() as a part of 'show ospf interface' command). There is also 8972a08fabfb6bf074480927d79f7b2869f52697 for BGP statistics that is just directly in 'show protocols all'. I would like to get some feedback and suggestions about how to integrate statistics presentation to other commands to avoid cluttering up output of other commands with statistics. Perhaps common option 'stats' that can be used to modify other commands (like 'show ospf interface') indicating that statistics should be displayed?
Signed-off-by: Kenth Eriksson <kenth.eriksson@infinera.com> --- proto/ospf/iface.c | 1 + proto/ospf/ospf.h | 6 ++++++ proto/ospf/packet.c | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/proto/ospf/iface.c b/proto/ospf/iface.c index 6e7e498f..988c0b70 100644 --- a/proto/ospf/iface.c +++ b/proto/ospf/iface.c @@ -1404,4 +1404,5 @@ ospf_iface_info(struct ospf_iface *ifa) cli_msg(-1015, "\tBackup designated router (ID): %R", ifa->bdrid); cli_msg(-1015, "\tBackup designated router (IP): %I", ifa->bdrip); } + cli_msg(-1015, "\tAuthentication drops: %u", ifa->stats.drop_auth); } diff --git a/proto/ospf/ospf.h b/proto/ospf/ospf.h index 8318ee95..e13e4bb2 100644 --- a/proto/ospf/ospf.h +++ b/proto/ospf/ospf.h @@ -273,6 +273,11 @@ struct ospf_area struct fib rtr; /* Routing tables for routers */ };
+struct ospf_iface_stats +{ + u32 drop_auth; /* Drops due to authentication fail */ +}; + struct ospf_iface { node n; @@ -316,6 +321,7 @@ struct ospf_iface u8 instance_id; /* Used to differentiate between more OSPF instances on one interface */ u8 autype; /* Authentication type (OSPF_AUTH_*) */ + struct ospf_iface_stats stats;/* Interface statistics */ u8 type; /* OSPF view of type (OSPF_IT_*) */ u8 strictnbma; /* Can I talk with unknown neighbors? */ u8 stub; /* Inactive interface */ diff --git a/proto/ospf/packet.c b/proto/ospf/packet.c index 599f3094..7c6c328e 100644 --- a/proto/ospf/packet.c +++ b/proto/ospf/packet.c @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ ospf_pkt_checkauth2(struct ospf_neighbor *n, struct ospf_iface *ifa, struct ospf if (n && (rcv_csn < n->csn)) // DROP("lower sequence number", rcv_csn); { + ifa->stats.drop_auth++; /* We want to report both new and old CSN */ LOG_PKT_AUTH("Authentication failed for nbr %R on %s - " "lower sequence number (rcv %u, old %u)", @@ -245,6 +246,7 @@ ospf_pkt_checkauth2(struct ospf_neighbor *n, struct ospf_iface *ifa, struct ospf }
drop: + ifa->stats.drop_auth++; LOG_PKT_AUTH("Authentication failed for nbr %R on %s - %s (%u)", (n ? n->rid : ntohl(pkt->routerid)), ifa->ifname, err_dsc, err_val);
@@ -327,6 +329,7 @@ ospf_pkt_checkauth3(struct ospf_neighbor *n, struct ospf_iface *ifa, struct ospf u64 rcv_csn = get_u64(&auth->csn); if (n && (rcv_csn <= n->csn64[pt])) { + ifa->stats.drop_auth++; /* We want to report both new and old CSN */ LOG_PKT_AUTH("Authentication failed for nbr %R on %s - " "lower sequence number (rcv %u, old %u)", @@ -358,6 +361,7 @@ ospf_pkt_checkauth3(struct ospf_neighbor *n, struct ospf_iface *ifa, struct ospf return 1;
drop: + ifa->stats.drop_auth++; LOG_PKT_AUTH("Authentication failed for nbr %R on %s - %s (%u)", (n ? n->rid : ntohl(pkt->routerid)), ifa->ifname, err_dsc, err_val);
-- 2.21.0
-- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."