In the thread "BIRD <-> Quagga Compatiblity" (started in May, 2007) I have already posted some informations. If you haven't access to the old thread, I could post the mails/infos again.
Thank you for a hint, i found that thread.
Is possible that Quagga does something wrong?
Perhaps Quagga has a different interpretation of some terms in OSPF RFC. There are Linux networking configurations (for example ptp network addresses) that does not fit well to assumptions used in OSPF RFC.
I have no problem to apply this little patch for every new release. But what is the difference between these two lines? 1.)ln->data = ifa->iface->index; 2.)ln->data = ipa_to_u32(ifa->iface->addr->ip); Could there be any problem (perhaps in a BIRD<->BIRD setup) if "ifa->iface->index" is never used in topology.c? Thanks. Best regards Elmi