17.06.2015 13:09, Ondrej Zajicek пишет:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:11:22PM +0300, Andrew wrote:
Also, with 1.5.0 I have long OSPF initialization (near 2 minutes - 1.4.5 and quagga starts much faster). I have OSPF debug log; should I attach it to mail (does mailing list supports attaches), or should I send it to your personal mail? The mailing list accepts attachments, you could send logs there. Also it would be useful to attach your OSPF configuration. Or you could send it directly to my personal mail, if you want.
In 1.5.0 there are changes in OSPF initialization, it is much faster in my test setup but it is possible that there might be some issues in some border cases. Unfortunately, OSPF initialization is just loosely specified by RFC 2328 and there are plenty of unspecified details.
I wonder if others have some negative or positive experience with OSPF initialization (neighbor establishment) in 1.5.0 compared to previous versions.
Ok, log is in attach. Config is trivial: protocol ospf ospf_ua { import all; area 0.0.0.0 { networks { 192.168.255.64/27; }; interface "vlan1" { cost 5; type broadcast; hello 10; retransmit 5; wait 40; dead count 4; authentication none; stub no; }; interface "*" { stub yes; }; }; } From other side, other server with bird-1.5.0 today fetches routes in less than minute. Config is almost same (except it has more areas/ifaces, and has enabled ecmp): protocol ospf ospf_mix { import all; export filter export_OSPF; ecmp yes; area 0 { networks { 192.168.255.64/27; }; interface "vlan1" { cost 5; type broadcast; hello 10; retransmit 5; wait 40; dead count 4; authentication none; stub no; }; }; area 1 { networks { 10.255.193.0/24; }; interface "vlan2" { cost 5; type broadcast; hello 10; retransmit 5; wait 40; dead count 4; authentication none; stub no; }; }; area 100 { networks { 10.255.192.0/24; }; interface "vlan3" { cost 5; type broadcast; hello 10; retransmit 5; wait 40; dead count 4; authentication none; stub no; }; }; }