Hello all, Here at $work we are using bird for OSPF at some 30 linux boxes. Works great. But there is a thing that confuses me: Let's have some simple linux box: # ip addr 1: lo: ...rest of loopback output 2: eth0@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 86:37:65:15:fa:d9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netns r2 inet 10.0.0.1/24 scope global eth0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever # ip route 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1 As you can see, there is single interface with single address, single device route automatically generated by kernel. Simple bird config: # cat bird.conf # BEGIN bird config router id 10.0.0.1; protocol device { scan time 3; } protocol kernel krnl4 { ipv4 { table master4; import all; export all; }; learn; } protocol ospf ospf1 { ipv4 { table master4; import all; export all; }; area 0.0.0.0 { stub no; interface "eth0" { stub yes; }; }; } # END bird config When I run bird with this configuration, it inserts another route: # ip route 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto bird scope link metric 32 Is this expected/correct behaviour? Or should I somehow filter those device routes out? I want those device routes to be read by OSPF, of course, just not to output them back. What is the best way to get rid of them? Another unrelated question: When I run bird, it logs this: bird: KRT: Netlink strict checking failed, will scan all tables at once bird: Started Should I do something about that failed strict check? Is it important or only some info message I shouldn't worry about? Thank you ico