Hi, why is it not possible to define BGP sessions like this? protocol bgp g60 { local as 64501; neighbor as 64499; ipv4 { import all; export all; }; local 192.0.2.4; neighbor 192.0.2.5; }; ipv6 { import all; export all; local 2001:db8::4; neighbor 2001:db8::5; }; }; It seems still necessary to write two bgp definitions separately for IPv4 and IPv6 repeating the AS numbers and name. I see no benefit from the Bird 1.6 notation here. Regards -- Robert Sander Heinlein Consulting GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin http://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-43 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 220009 B / Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin