29 Jun
2011
29 Jun
'11
12:13 a.m.
Matthew, on 29.06.2011 01:59 Matthew Walster wrote:
I could be wrong, but the most logical explanation would be:
2011-04-29 18:24:36 <RMT> XXXX: Received: Hold timer expired
Notification received, hold timer expired (error code 3.4, as per RFC1771).
2011-04-30 00:05:42 <RMT> YYYY: Error: Hold timer expired
Hold timer expired locally. Presumably a notification would be generated and sent to the remote peer before session tear-down.
Is that not the case?
Would make sense. Otoh iirc <RMT> means that the message is received from the ReMoTe peer. I may be wrong. Arnold -- Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany email: arnold@nipper.de phone: +49 6224 9259 299 mobile: +49 152 53717690 fax: +49 6224 9259 333