maybe ucarp ? http://www.ucarp.org/project/ucarp On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> wrote:
Ondrej,
--On 16 May 2011 21:59:56 +0200 Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@crfreenet.org> wrote:
NSSA: This seems to be, surprisingly for me, the most requested feature, as it does not look hard to implement i will probably implement that in near future.
Thanks
VRRP: Maybe. Is there any advantage if it is integrated in routing daemon (instead of using independent VRRP daemon)? I would guess that there isn't any interaction between VRRP and routing, but i don't have any experience with VRRP.
We would be interested in a sane implementation of VRRP. We'd also be even more interested in other interfaces redundancy protocols that do not "waste" IP addresses (e.g. do not use IP addresses for the native interfaces). One problem with VRRP is that it is allegedly patent encumbered.
-- Alex Bligh
-- Thanx and regd's. Allan. http://www.in2dwok.com