One more info from cisco (without alias adressess and no other neighbor): Router#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (3.0.0.1) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0.0.0.0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 1.0.0.2 1.0.0.2 1141 0x8000001F 0x003CE2 1 3.0.0.1 3.0.0.1 951 0x80000011 0x00A96B 1 Net Link States (Area 0.0.0.0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum 1.0.0.1 3.0.0.1 951 0x80000007 0x00A185 Type-5 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag 0.0.0.0 3.0.0.1 691 0x80000009 0x000A9C 1 192.0.2.0 1.0.0.2 1145 0x80000001 0x000DCA 0 2009/10/3 Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@crfreenet.org>:
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 07:39:55PM +0200, Csaba Szép wrote:
Hi All!
Hello
First, the HELLO packet ignored with "Bad OSPF hello packet from 1.0.0.1 received: options mismatch (0x12)." if i use the cisco default ospf configuration.
With "ip ospf lls disable" option everything is ok.
This is probably inappropriate options handling in BIRD, we will fix it.
Second, i advertise some alias IP from the pc to the cisco router, but if i remove the alias address from the interface some OSPF routes still present in the cisco router.
So i suppose the problem is just the route 192.0.2.0/24 ? I am not sure where it comes from. Could you send me output of command 'show interfaces' and 'show ospf state' on BIRD?
-- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrHmYsACgkQw1GB2RHercPcRwCdEKZ5qvQMPsv9AfkEaK92hMmE E/sAn0NC0cYKnJPpod7tggz0v0NrrAMp =n3gv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----