12 Jun
2020
12 Jun
'20
6:33 p.m.
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 16:01 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:42:56PM +0000, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
Why is the route fe80::7270:8bff:fee8:8081 considered dormant? OSPF and static routes have different administrative distance and the static route has lower AD (higher bird preference).
Perhaps you do not have defined iface for link-local route? We should check for that and rejectlink-local routes without specified iface immediately. With iface, it works for me:
Yes static route was given as an immediate nexthop gateway ip. Why is it not possible to resolve the outgoing interface for that case? Neighbor table?