On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:31:16PM +0000, Nigel Kukard wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm having an issue where IPv6 routes from the kernel routing table don't appear to end up in my t_kernel6 table. Despite the next-hop being link-local and the interface being UP. ... Here is the error I'm getting in my logs and fc11::/64 is not being shown in my t _kernel6 table...
2019-09-11 11:40:36.653 <ERR> KRT: Received route fc11::/64 with strange next-hop fc10::2 ... Here is the kernel routing table 'ip -6 route'...
fc00::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium fc10::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium *fc11::/64 via fc10::2 dev eth1 metric 1024 pref medium* fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
Hi Works for me: bird> show route table t_kernel6 Table t_kernel6: fc11::/64 unicast [kernel2 16:20:13.398] (10) via fc10::2 on eth0 What is your 'show interfaces' status? -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."