I am in the process of implementing your suggestion of assigning IPs from a pool specific to each router. Initial results suggest that it works perfectly! Thank you for the feedback! Example: router1: stubnet 172.16.16.0/29 router2 tun: 172.16.16.0 router3 tun: 172.16.16.1 router2: stubnet 172.16.16.8/29 router1 tun: 172.16.16.8 router3 tun: 172.16.16.9 router3: stubnet 172.16.16.16/29 router1 tun: 172.16.16.16 router2 tun: 172.16.16.17 On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@crfreenet.org>wrote:
I would have another suggestion - do not propagate these as independent /32s. Either consider them as a kind of 'link-local' IP, or use IPs for them from some wider pool (either some local ethernet stub network or some designated pool of ptp endpoint IPs for given router), which is propagated as a whole.