Hello, yes, that's correct, we'll fix this in a different way, please stand by. Thank you for your understanding. Maria On 8 January 2025 15:56:00 CET, Jelle Luteijn via Bird-users <bird-users@network.cz> wrote:
Hoi,
I just checked and I don't see the updated packages, is that correct?
Regards, Jelle
-----Original Message----- From: Bird-users <bird-users-bounces@network.cz> On Behalf Of Jakub Ružicka via Bird-users Sent: Tuesday, 7 January 2025 13:19 To: bird-users@network.cz Subject: Re: Bird 2.16 ASPA issue
Hello,
On 1/6/25 10:51, Job Snijders wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Maria Matejka wrote:
The right one is "providers", yet there is probably some package out with "provider", so i'm expecting to allow both in the end because we botched it in such a stupid way. I'd recommend to rebuild the Debian packages, bump the sub version, and call it a day. This is a simple bug, 'provider' never was documented as being correct, afaik. I was asked to prepare Debian packages before official release of
https://bird.network.cz/download/bird-2.16.tar.gz
so I've used v2.16 git tag at
4fb8fe6 NEWS and version update
however it turns out the official tarball doesn't correspond to the tag - it contains extra patches including
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/c926a6e105f7eb27ea3d1f7368a508eb42e...
This discrepancy between the tarball and git is the cause for all this confusion as well as the need to rebuild packages.
Please make sure the official tarball matches corresponding git tag on future releases.
I also suggest re-creating v2.16 tag upstream on top of the commit that was actually used to create bird-2.16.tar.gz archive.
I'm starting bird2_2.16-cznic.2 packages build from official bird-2.16.tar.gz archive - they should hit the repos later today.
Cheers, Jakub
-- Maria Matejka (she/her) | BIRD Team Leader | CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.