August 2019 - Bird-users

Adding more then one bgp community at once
by Борис Коваленко 05 May '23

05 May '23

Hello! Is this possible to add many communites at once? bgp_community.add([(1,1), (1,2)]) is wrong "Setting clist attribute to non-clist value" Regards, Boris -- С уважением, Борис Коваленко

4 5

[PATCH] feature to keep protocol's state while configuring
by Alexander Zubkov 29 Jan '23

29 Jan '23

Hello. I have created a patch (attached) with new protocol option: disabled keep on|off. To keep the protocol's state while loading new config. It is useful when protocols disabled manually in the runtime, but we want to keep that state when loading new config. Patch is attached. I have made it against the current int-new branch.

3 16

IGP Metric to MED
by Corban Johnson 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hello, I am trying to set MED on a BGP route using the metric value from OSPF, but the attributes of the next-hop route do not seem to be available in filter evolution. Am I missing something? Example Bird 2.0 config: protocol bgp test_peer { bfd on; med metric on; graceful restart on; ipv4 { table test_table; gateway recursive; }; local as 65656; } protocol ospf t1_igp { ipv4 { table test_table; }; } OSPF is distributing loopbacks and link nets only. BGP protocols from ‘test_peer’ will use routes learned from ‘t1_igp’ in ‘test_table’ to resolve next hop information (gateway recursive). So far, so good. However, I also have an eBGP peer (i.e. who is not participating in my IGP above) who is multi homed with AS65656. I would like to use MED to inform the peer about my IGP distances to each exit — something like the ‘metric-out minimum-igp <offset>’ command in Junos (https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/reference/configur…) > You can increase or decrease the variable metric calculated from the IGP metric (either from the igp or minimum-igp statement) by specifying a value for offset. The metric is increased by specifying a positive value for offset, and decreased by specifying a negative value for offset. The problem seems to be that filters may only access attributes of the route currently processed, and the 'gateway recursive’ channel directive only calculates next-hop without passing any route attributes of that next-hop through. Has anyone had any luck trying something similar? Many thanks.

3 5

IPv6 BGP & kernel 4.19
by Robert Sander 25 Aug '21

25 Aug '21

Hi, our routers run on Debian stretch with bird 1.6.4 from bird.network.cz/debian. Yesterday I tried kernel 4.19 from backports.debian.org and ran into a weird issue with IPv6 BGP sessions: All Peerings reported "Error: Hold timer expired" ca. every 40 minutes. IPv6 forwarding was flapping all the time. After rebooting into kernel 4.9 everything worked again. IPv4 BGP was not affected and also OSPF (v4 and v6). I could disable all IPv6 BGP peerings on this router and then it forwarded to another router learned via OSPF for IPv6 without issues. Has anyone seen such a behaviour? Regards -- Robert Sander Heinlein Support GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin https://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-43 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg - HRB 93818 B Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein - Sitz: Berlin

13 39

Bug: BFD confuses sessions with identical IPv6 link-local addresses
by Julian Brost 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

Hi, I just tried to enable BFD for some OSPF and BGP connections and ran into an issue which BFD sessions flapping up and down and Bird logging many messages like these: bfd1: Bad packet from fe80::2 - unknown session id (130079069) bfd1: Bad packet from fe80::2 - unknown session id (3102513000) bfd1: Bad packet from fe80::2 - unknown session id (3650438750) bfd1: Bad packet from fe80::2 - unknown session id (1597034259) This presumably happens due to this piece of code in bfd_rx_hook() in proto/bfd/packets.c: s = bfd_find_session_by_addr(p, sk->faddr); I use fe80::1/fe80::2 as addresses for most of my IPv6 peering connections and sk->faddr is just a 128 bit value, so it contains no interface identifier, which likely leads to Bird confusing multiple BFD sessions. Regards, Julian

3 5

[PATCH] babel: Set onlink flag for IPv4 routes with unreachable next hop
by Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 14 Apr '20

14 Apr '20

If the next hop of a route is not a reachable address, the route should be installed as onlink. This enables a configuration common in mesh networks where the mesh interface is assigned a /32 and babel handles the routing by installing onlink routes. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke(a)toke.dk> --- proto/babel/babel.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/proto/babel/babel.c b/proto/babel/babel.c index 88c4711e..4fd88042 100644 --- a/proto/babel/babel.c +++ b/proto/babel/babel.c @@ -640,6 +640,13 @@ babel_announce_rte(struct babel_proto *p, struct babel_entry *e) .nh.iface = r->neigh->ifa->iface, }; + /* If we cannot find a reachable neighbour, set the entry to be onlink. This + * makes it possible to, e.g., assign /32 addresses on a mesh interface and + * have routing work. + */ + if (!neigh_find2(&p->p, &r->next_hop, r->neigh->ifa->iface, 0)) + a0.nh.flags = RNF_ONLINK; + rta *a = rta_lookup(&a0); rte *rte = rte_get_temp(a); rte->u.babel.seqno = r->seqno; -- 2.17.0

3 4

How to determine when reconfiguration is complete?
by Kenth Eriksson 04 Dec '19

04 Dec '19

Hi! How can I tell when bird is done with reconfiguration? E.g. bird can respond: "Reconfiguration in progress", but how do you know when it is ready? Invoking configure again will trigger full re-configure again I guess? Thanks, Kenth

5 16

Bird 1.6.3 removing IPv6 device routes on Linux (3.10.0)
by Ben Arblaster 12 Oct '19

12 Oct '19

Hi, I’m seeing an issue with bird 1.6.3 where IPv6 device routes are unexpectedly removed from the kernel table on Linux (3.10.0, CentOS 7) when bird removes a matching route learned via another protocol (in this case OSPF). To reproduce, I’ve rigged up a very simple test with two bird6 instances running OSPF in a single area 0 over a ptp tunnel. Configs are here - https://gist.github.com/andatche/ca5b5ac120e09b6b8171ec5ca95d2e25 If I add an address/network (e.g. fd00::1/64) to an interface (dummy0) on host A, the route is flooded by A, learned by B and correctly installed in the kernel table on B: fd00::/64 via fe80::5efe:ae2:b006 dev tun0 proto bird metric 1024 If I then add the same address/network (e.g. fd00::1/64) to an interface (dummy0) on host B, at that instant a device route is installed in the kernel table alongside the existing route on host B and it now looks like this: fd00::/64 dev dummy0 proto kernel metric 256 fd00::/64 via fe80::5efe:ae2:b006 dev tun0 proto bird metric 1024 Shortly after, bird picks up the new address/network on dummy0, recalculates the area and correctly selects the connected route as the new best. It then removes the old route via host A from the kernel table, as expected: kernel1 < removed fd00::/64 via fe80::5efe:ae2:b006 on tun0 However, this causes both the route via host A *and* the device route to be removed from the kernel table, leaving the kernel table on host B with no route to fd00::/64 at all. # ip -6 route show fd00::/64 # This is a change in behaviour from 1.4.5 and seems like a bug, rather than the expected behaviour? Regards, Ben -- Ben Arblaster e: ben(a)andatche.com t: +447943860840 w: https://andatche.com

3 3

Debian packages for BIRD 2
by Ondrej Zajicek 14 Sep '19

14 Sep '19

Hello Several days ago i received info that BIRD 2.0.4 is now packaged in Debian (unstable): https://packages.debian.org/sid/bird2 Thanks to Ondrej Sury and others. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago(a)crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."

4 5

bird >=2.0.4 Stack underflow and most routes become filtered
by Дружок 1 13 Sep '19

13 Sep '19

Hi! .. /var/log/bird.log 2019-08-22 15:38:38.604 <ERR> filters, line 1023: Stack underflow 2019-08-22 18:02:27.157 <ERR> filters, line 511: Stack underflow 2019-08-22 18:02:30.616 <ERR> filters, line 0: Stack underflow.... ... function bgp_in(int peer_as; prefix set peer_nets) { if ! (avoid_martians()) then return false; if ! (net ~ peer_nets) then return false; if (bgp_path.first != peer_as ) then return false; # if (is_black()) then return true; # if net.len > 24 then return false; return true; } .. define DataClub_nets = [ 46.183.216.0/21{21,32} <http://46.183.216.0/21%7B21,32%7D>, 84.38.128.0/24{24,32} <http://84.38.128.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 84.38.130.0/24{24,32} <http://84.38.130.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 84.38.131.0/24{24,32} <http://84.38.131.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 84.38.132.0/24{24,32} <http://84.38.132.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 84.38.134.0/24{24,32} <http://84.38.134.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 84.38.135.0/24{24,32} <http://84.38.135.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 109.248.147.0/24{24,32} <http://109.248.147.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 109.248.148.0/24{24,32} <http://109.248.148.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 109.248.149.0/24{24,32} <http://109.248.149.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 185.220.116.0/24{24,32} <http://185.220.116.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 185.220.117.0/24{24,32} <http://185.220.117.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 185.220.118.0/24{24,32} <http://185.220.118.0/24%7B24,32%7D>, 194.165.16.0/23{23,32} <http://194.165.16.0/23%7B23,32%7D> ]; .. protocol bgp DataClub from PEERS { description "DataClub/52048/as-dataclub"; neighbor 193.27.39.4 as 52048; ipv4 { import where bgp_in(52048, DataClub_nets); export where bgp_out(52048, 64004); }; } ... I redid the configuration something like ... ipv4 { import filter myfilter; .. ... then I issue test "show route filter myfilter" and get all nets. But in fact, all these routes were filtered. And, finally, only "accept" remained in the filter - this method unfiltered routes. Bug, feature? P.S.: Bird <= 2.0.3 is OK.

5 7