- Bird-users - Mailing Lists

FIB aggregation
by Andre Nathan 27 Jan '17

27 Jan '17

Hi I was looking for FIB aggregation support in Bird. I managed to find some academic papers on the subject, for things like FIFA [1] and SMALTA [2], and this thread from 5 year ago: http://bird-users.network.narkive.com/Qusamzzd/route-aggregation-in-bird-how Has there been any development in this area for Bird? Cheers, Andre [1] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6566913/ [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-uzmi-smalta-01

1 0

print and bgp_large_community
by Robert Sander 27 Jan '17

27 Jan '17

Hi, I need to print the bgp_large_community for debugging purposes but all I get is the output "(lclist )". Are these list not printable? Regards -- Robert Sander Heinlein Support GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin http://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-43 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin

2 7

OSPF on bridged network
by Dean 26 Jan '17

26 Jan '17

Hello, I'm trying to setup OSPF to run between docker containers, and I have connected three containers to a bridge using veth interfaces. However, each container considers itself to be Designated Router for the network, and doesn't even acknowledge the others (none is in the neighbor list). Below is my configuration: log "/bird/rt3/bird.log" all; router id 3; protocol device { scan time 10; } protocol kernel { export all; scan time 15; } protocol ospf { debug all; import all; area 1 { networks { 2001:db9:4::/64; }; interface "v4" { cost 5; type ptp; hello 5; retransmit 2; wait 10; dead 20; }; interface "vn3" { priority 3; cost 5; type broadcast; hello 5; retransmit 2; wait 10; dead 20; }; }; } The two other containers have the pretty much the same configuration. Only the interface names, priority and router ID is different. Any idea what is going on here? Thank you.

1 1

logical operations on parts of pairs
by Stefan Plug 26 Jan '17

26 Jan '17

Hi guys, Is there a way to do logical operations on only 1 of the 2 ints in a pair? case: I would like to check if in community (xxx,yyy) yyy is bigger than some other variable. I now have something like this: define deny = 1337; define maxRange 100; define denyRange = [ (deny,1)..(deny,maxRange) ]; if (bgp_community ~ DenyRange) then { print "ALARM!"; ### PSEUDO CODE #### if bgp_community.part2 >= 10 { return false; } } Same question for extended and large communities, but I assume that would work the same way. Regards, Stefan -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet Stefan Plug Network Engineer spl(a)ecix.net GSM: +49.151.58040805 Fax: +49.30.81495459 Web: http://www.ecix.net/ PEERING GmbH - Division ECIX Lindenallee 27 14050 Berlin Germany Geschaeftsfuehrer: Stefan Wahl Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 97752B, USt-Id-Nr: DE2746301838

1 1

[PATCH] Fix filter comparison when using !~
by Vincent Bernat 24 Jan '17

24 Jan '17

From: Vincent Bernat <vincent(a)bernat.im> When BIRD compares a filter using the `!~`, we get: Unknown instruction 8574 in same (~) This is due to the missing case for the `!~` operator. Add it. --- filter/filter.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/filter/filter.c b/filter/filter.c index 85a062586089..f18970e05939 100644 --- a/filter/filter.c +++ b/filter/filter.c @@ -1559,6 +1559,7 @@ i_same(struct f_inst *f1, struct f_inst *f2) case P('<','='): TWOARGS; break; case '!': ONEARG; break; + case P('!', '~'): case '~': TWOARGS; break; case P('d','e'): ONEARG; break; -- 2.11.0

2 1

full route table
by OUYANG JUNJIE 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

hi. I'm looking for a way to import mrt data into bird. I fount two Global options (mrtdump "filename" & mrtdump protocols all|off|{ states|messages [, ...] }), but I don't know how to use it... if anyone knows, can you help me? Thank you very much. regards, Ouyang

3 2

Re-set-ing constants/variables
by Maximilian Wilhelm 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

Hi, I'm working on a (Freifunk) network setup based on Linux and Bird using an OSPF/iBGP configuration which basicly works like a charm. Now I have some setups where multiple prefixes are configured on a node either for connected networks or for some anycasted ressources. To be able to enable/disable exporting these prefixes separately base on different criteria (probaly by different check scripts trigger by cron or something like this) I thought about options to realize this. All my configuration is centrally managed by Salt and some mighty templates. My first though was to have something like the following in the global configuration define SITE_LEGACY_ONLINE = 0; define SITE_PADCTY_ONLINE = 0; define SITE_PADUML_ONLINE = 0; define DRAINED = 0; an later re-set these values to 0 in separate config files which are automagically generated by some script of other means. Thereby I can have useful defaults and only when a check rules for a positive outcome a SITE would go online (read: the prefix would be announed). Any I make sure the configuration as a whole is useful all the time. Now I tried to just reset a value like SITE_LEGACY_ONLINE = 1; or define SITE_LEGACY_ONLINE = 1; later in the configuration but both raise configuration errors (as I was afraid they would). Are there any means to build something like that? Like having some defaults in the main config and re-set these values later on (in other config snippets)? If I would generate the defines by a script I would have some time where this part might be missing (like on first install) and my config would fail to load as the defines are referenced but not defined. Thanks for any ideas how to build something like that. :) Best Max -- "Wer nicht mehr liebt und nicht mehr irrt, der lasse sich begraben." -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

2 1

Use Variables / Defines in include statements
by Tim Weippert 17 Jan '17

17 Jan '17

Hi, i currently try to do different includes, based on an variable/define within the config. for example: function test(int asn) { [ do something general ] include "/etc/bird/" . asn . "-special.conf"; } As this approach doesn't work, is there currently an possibility to do such includes somehow? regards, tim -- Tim Weippert http://weiti.org - weiti(a)weiti.org GPG Fingerprint - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1 398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8

3 3

OSPF socket error on "bge0" invalid argument
by David S. 15 Jan '17

15 Jan '17

Dear All, I have trouble to establish ospf on BIRD 1.6.3 using FreeBSD 11 amd64, here is my topology and BIRD configuration: router-a ------ router-b (directly connected use cat6) router-a: 10.22.40.17/30 router-b: 10.22.40.18/30 bird.conf in router-a router id 10.5.16.1; debug all; import filter ospf_in_routerb; export filter ospf_out_routerb; tick 2; area 0 { interface "bge0" { stub; cost 5; hello 10; retransmit 2; wait 10; dead 40; type pointopoint; }; networks { 103.22.40.16/30; }; interface "*" { cost 1000; stub; }; }; } bird.conf in routerb router id 10.5.16.2; debug all; import filter ospf_in_routera; export filter ospf_out_routera; tick 2; area 0 { interface "bge0" { stub; cost 5; hello 10; retransmit 2; wait 10; dead 40; type pointopoint; }; networks { 103.22.40.16/30; }; interface "*" { cost 1000; stub; }; }; } I found the following error message from bird.log: 2016-12-31 07:52:38 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:52:43 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:52:48 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:52:53 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:52:57 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:53:03 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:53:07 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:53:13 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:53:18 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:53:22 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:53:27 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument 2016-12-31 07:53:28 <ERR> ospf1: Socket error on bge0: Invalid argument Show ospf: bird> show ospf ospf1: RFC1583 compatibility: disabled Stub router: No RT scheduler tick: 2 Number of areas: 1 Number of LSAs in DB: 260 Area: 0.0.0.0 (0) [BACKBONE] Stub: No NSSA: No Transit: No Number of interfaces: 25 Number of neighbors: 0 Number of adjacent neighbors: 0 Area networks: 10.22.40.16/30 Advertise bird> show protocols all ospf1 name proto table state since info ospf1 OSPF master up 07:53:28 Alone Router ID: 10.8.60.1 Preference: 150 Input filter: ospf_in_routerb Output filter: ospf_out_routerb Routes: 25 imported, 259 exported, 0 preferred Route change stats: received rejected filtered ignored accepted Import updates: 25 0 0 0 25 Import withdraws: 0 0 --- 0 0 Export updates: 630587 0 630328 --- 259 Export withdraws: 22 --- --- --- 0 Why ospf neighbor can't established? I'm new to ospf and really need help. Thank you Best regards, David S. ------------------------------------------------ e. david(a)zeromail.us w. pnyet.web.id

7 20

is there a better way to get aliases sent
by Jerry Scharf 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hi, I am running bird on a bunch of border machines. We have a local 172.16 net that connects the border machines with the edge routers who peer with the ISPs. The borders have a whole bunch of host aliases that they answer for and want to ibgp advertise those to the edge routers. The borders have dual network connections to the edge to reduce single point of failure situations. I did the classic attach the host addresses to the loopback address so if an interface goes down the host aliases don't. The problem is that these don't get inserted into the kernel routing table automatically. To get around this I put a static route via "lo" for each one in bird. It works but is a pain because I have to keep the startup config files and bird in sync. I am dealing with over 100 aliases, so the opportunity for error is significant. I have written some simple automation to help, but before I live with this I want to see if there is a better way to do this? thanks, jerry -- Soundhound Devops "What could possibly go wrong?"

2 1